In a small town in Pennsylvania, a teacher’s harsh comments on a second-grade paper sparked outrage and attracted the attention of parents and the wider community.
What began as a seemingly innocent grading error quickly escalated into a public outcry, raising serious concerns about the educator’s approach to teaching and the emotional well-being of her students. As details of the incident emerge, many are asking:
how could a teacher entrusted with the care and development of young minds go so far as to publicly humiliate a child? What could have been a simple mistake has now become a disturbing example of how power can be abused in the classroom.
Yes, a Pennsylvania dad named Chris Piland was horrified to see what his teacher wrote on a paper his second grader turned in. In addition to bullying Piland’s young child, the instructor also tried to make him feel stupid and humiliated. him before his peers—the exact opposite of what educators should be doing if they are committed to helping students learn.
So what did the teacher do? Across the little boy’s assignment was scrawled “Absolutely Pathetic.” Because of the disrespectful remark, Piland is now asking the teacher to terminate his employment.
Because they work at Valley View Elementary, the teacher is happy to receive regular paychecks. However, they have recently come under fire for abusing their authority over children. In addition to finding that the teacher believed his young son’s intelligence was “absolutely pitiful”, Piland also concluded that the teacher was failing in his duties.
Instructor Alyssa Rupp Bohenek has already been identified. She wrote her notes with a red pen, which is indicative of below average student work. The full statement was:
“Very poor—he answered thirteen questions in just three minutes! Sad. Then she grimaced.”
The goal of the assignment was to find out the number of subtraction problems that second-grade students could solve. After giving the children three minutes to fill them in, the teacher was horrified to see that Piland’s son, who was the worst in the class, could only complete thirteen.
Pilandová called out Bohenka for her animosity when she uploaded a photo of the entrance to the Internet.
“My son, Kamdyn’s teacher, has been extremely cruel to him and me all year long. When someone writes this on a child’s work, when they take it home, it infuriates me to no end. ‘What an amazing inspiration,'” he wrote alongside photograph.
Piland didn’t want the teacher to get away with her crime against his child, so he started an online petition to get her fired so she wouldn’t abuse her power over other young sophomores.
The outrage prompted schools inspector Rose Minniti to respond. She said she previously held a meeting with the accused instructor to investigate the claims and decide whether termination was the right course of action after learning about the test last week.
According to Minniti, social media will not affect how this staffing issue turns out. Facts and evidence are decisive. We constantly strive to find a balance between what is best for the children and what is necessary for the safety of the employee under investigation.
Bohenka has been working at an elementary school since 2013. Is she tired of assisting young children? From the looks of her reply, she seems to be done.
The controversy surrounding Alyssa Rupp Bohenkova’s actions has sparked intense debate and raised serious questions about the role of teachers in creating a positive learning environment. As Chris Piland continues to seek accountability for the hurtful comments on his son’s paper, the situation underscores the importance of educators using their positions to encourage and uplift students, rather than diminishing them.
The school district’s investigation will be key to determining whether appropriate measures will be taken not only in the interest of one family, but also to ensure the well-being and emotional safety of all students under the teacher’s care. As the community waits for answers, this case serves as a stark reminder of the profound impact that teachers — both positive and negative — can have on young minds.