It was supposed to be a highly anticipated film adaptation that ends in our country, but behind the scenes the tension was reportedly cooked into a fully blown scandal.
What began as a creative difference was reportedly escalated to a toxic working environment, which led to shocking demands and legal battles.
Now, the leading actress of the film, Blake Lively, opposed her costume and director Justin Baldoni and accused him of S*xual harassment and misconduct at the workplace.
When Hollywood and fans respond to a developing drama, there are new details about what really happened on the scene.
After months of reported tension between Blak Livela and Justin Baldoni, he sued for S*xual harassment…
Blake lively sues “it ends with us” co-star Justin Baldoni for S*xual harassment.
After months of reported tension in his end, Blake Lively filed a lawsuit against her star and director Justin Baldoni and accused him of S*xual harassment.
According to the legal documents acquired by TMZ and The New York Times, Lively, 37, claims that Baldoni’s actions have caused her “serious emotional anxiety”.
The Court states that a meeting was held to solve Lively’s concerns about the enemy working environment on the scene. Among her participation was her husband Ryan Reynolds.
Livela complaints included several requirements, for example:
Baldoni must stop showing naked videos or pictures of women
No more discussion about his alleged addiction to pornography
No more talks about S*xual meetings in front of her and other crew members
No references to the genitals of the cast and crew members
No comments about her weight
No mention of her deceased father
In addition, the lawsuit demanded that the unauthorized supplements of the S*xual scenes of the film, including explicit content, such as oral S*x or climax on the camera beyond what was originally agreed.
According to TMZ, Sony Pictures Lively approved the requirements. However, the lawsuit claims that Baldoni (40) has launched a campaign for social manipulation for destroying Livela’s reputation. The submission allegedly includes text messages between the Baldoni journalist and the journalist of the studio, allegedly stating that the Baldoni “wants to feel like [alive]” and “we cannot write it to destroy it”.
Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, responded to Livela’s accusation in a statement for us a week and called them “completely false, outrageous and intentionally unwilling”. He claimed that Lively used the action to “remedy her negative reputation” and “correct the narrative” of the problem production of the film.
Freedman further claimed that Lively had attracted “more requirements and threats”, including the refusal to appear on the scene or promote a film he claimed to have contributed to the wrong acceptance of the film after his release.
However, he denied the attempt to damage the Baldoni legend. In her statement The New York Times said, “I hope my legal steps helps to reveal these ominous retaliation tactics used against those who speak of misconduct and protect others who can be focused.”
After his August edition after its August issue, during its August edition, rumors of the disturbance between the living and Baldoni intensified. The fans noticed that Lively participated in press events with other cast members, while the Baldoni was considerably missing.
The initiate told us every week: “There were two camps in the film – Team Blake and Team Justin. Creative conflicts determine the tone of a tense work environment, which eventually led to the reducing ties. ”
The legal battle between Blak Lively and Justin Baldoni brought significant attention to the alleged behind-the-scenes dealings that end in our country. With the accusations of the enemy working environment, social manipulation and retaliation, the action has intensified the tension between the two stars.
While Lively is trying to reveal what he describes as misconduct and protect others from similar experiences, the Baldoni and his legal team deny the claims and refuse them as an attempt to rescue itheir reputation Since this case takes place, it remains to be seen how these accusations will affect the career of actors and to address disputes in the workplace in the future.