It is an argument about what the DNA study means, and what it does not mean.

What the Research Team Said, and What They Did Not Say

The peer-reviewed publication of the Sitting Bull DNA study was accompanied by statements from the research team that were notably careful in their framing — more careful, in many cases, than the subsequent media coverage.

Eske Willerslev and his colleagues stated that their analysis found genetic evidence consistent with a familial relationship between the hair sample and Ernie LaPointe at the generational distance consistent with the great-grandfather/great-grandson relationship that LaPointe had identified through family history.

They did not state that the DNA analysis proved LaPointe’s descent from Sitting Bull.