But the Loch Borralie evidence adds specificity that was previously absent: a documented sequence of specific actions, performed on a specific individual, whose biological identity and social connections can now be at least partially characterized.

What it does not change is the fundamental uncertainty about the meanings and motivations behind these practices.

The bones can tell us what was done, but they cannot tell us why.

The archaeological evidence can establish the physical sequence of events — fracture, cut marks, bone modification, reassembly, deposition — but it cannot reach the interior life of the people who performed these actions, cannot access the beliefs and experiences that gave those actions their meaning.

This gap between the archaeological evidence and the meaning it encoded is not a failure of the analysis.