It was important evidence about the collection, not an appointment that automatically made her owner or executor of every asset.

There was also a statement attributed to Ruth Halpern, a witness to the March 9, 1998 discussion.

Daniel read the relevant passage.

Julian had objected when the arrangement was described as giving away the house.

His stated intention was to authorize payment of household expenses.

“Does that prove what he signed?” I asked.

“It supports an account of the discussion.

We need to compare the actual versions and verify the material as far as possible.