“The timeline remains medically difficult,” Dr.

Kenneth told us.

“We’re reconstructing it from imperfect records.

We cannot assume she was continuously unresponsive or continuously without medical observation.

The facts need to be established, not fitted to a neat story.” I was grateful for his caution, even when it frustrated me.

The independent review discovered that the original response to Rachel’s collapse had been documented inconsistently.

Initial cardiac readings, transport paperwork, and subsequent certification notes had gaps that demanded explanation.

Several people involved had accepted what others told them rather than repeating required checks.