STANDING BEAR WAS ARRESTED FOR TRYING TO GO HOME – THEN HIS CASE FORCED A U.S. COURT TO DECIDE IF A NATIVE MAN WAS A “PERSON”
If the law allowed “persons” to demand that explanation, Standing Bear was a person.
THE STORY WAS ABOUT MOVEMENT AS MUCH AS PERSONHOOD
Another overlooked dimension of Standing Bear v.
Crook is freedom of movement.
The immediate conflict began because Standing Bear left Indian Territory without permission.
To understand the significance, imagine the legal and psychological reality of being told that a boundary hundreds of miles from your homeland was not merely where the government expected you to live, but a place you could not freely leave.
You Might Also Like
The Extra Place at the Table
Daily Gossips
I Stopped Holding Him Up
Daily Gossips
He Missed the Race, the Ribbon, the Science Olympiad, and Every Birthday, Then Tried to Buy It All Back With a Laptop Left on the Porch — My Son Carried It Back Outside Still Sealed and Said an Expensive Gift Doesn’t Return a Childhood
Daily Gossips
Where to Look
Daily Gossips