STANDING BEAR WAS ARRESTED FOR TRYING TO GO HOME – THEN HIS CASE FORCED A U.S. COURT TO DECIDE IF A NATIVE MAN WAS A “PERSON”
The case compelled the United States legal system to acknowledge that it could not deny him access to a basic protection against unlawful imprisonment.
The distinction changes the moral center of the story.
Standing Bear is not important because a judge rescued him from nonpersonhood.
He is important because he confronted a legal system that attempted to make his rights disappear inside a category of federal control.
He won.
And then the limits of that victory became part of the story too.