The 23,000-Year-Old Footprints Found In New Mexico – And The Evidence That Rewrote America’s Human Timeline
Monte Verde in the 1970s and 1980s, Meadowcroft Rockshelter and its controversial dates, the Paisley Caves, the Friedkin site in Texas, and numerous other sites each contributed a piece of evidence that pointed in the same direction: people had been in the Americas before Clovis, and they had been there for considerably longer than the standard model allowed.
But the pre-Clovis claims were often met with skepticism — sometimes legitimate methodological skepticism, sometimes what critics characterized as a systematic reluctance to abandon the Clovis-first framework.
The bar for evidence of pre-Clovis occupation was set very high, and different researchers set it at different levels.
What one group of researchers considered compelling evidence of pre-Clovis presence, another dismissed as ambiguous or contaminated.
White Sands entered this debate with several advantages over many previous pre-Clovis claims.
The evidence was not stone tools, which can be ambiguous — human-made or naturally fractured, the debates over some claimed pre-Clovis tools have lasted decades.