THE ANCIENT MAN BESIDE THE RIVER
They could only hint, through chemistry and shape and the evidence of healed trauma, at the outlines of a life that would always remain, at its core, unknowable.
But the questions were enough.
Chatters prepared a preliminary report.
He shared his findings with colleagues.
Word spread in the scientific community with the speed that professional gossip always travels — faster than formal publication, carried from researcher to researcher by phone and email and conference-corridor conversation.
The initial morphological assessment — the impressionistic, preliminary, not-yet-peer-reviewed observation about the skull’s features — was the part that caught fire.
And then two things happened almost simultaneously that turned a scientific story into a national crisis.
First, the story got out to the media.
Second, five tribal nations filed a claim.
SECTION 6: THE CLAIM — AND WHAT IT MEANT