The feedback is immediate and unambiguous.

The numbers that describe her career have not been held to that standard.

The biographical record has, in various tellings, attributed to her specific achievements that the documented record does not fully support, and has sometimes failed to document the achievements the record does support with the specificity they deserve.

The precision she brought to her work has not always been applied to the account of that work.

Part of that is the inevitable imprecision of history — the way records degrade, the way institutional memory is selective, the way biographical reconstruction always involves gaps and educated inferences.