Each discrepancy between Bourdin’s presentation and what Nicholas should have been like had an explanation built into the trafficking narrative.

The more questions were raised about the inconsistencies, the more the trafficking narrative was invoked to explain them.

This is an effective manipulation structure.

It creates a situation in which raising doubts — questioning the discrepancies — can be framed as cruel skepticism toward a traumatized child.

The desire not to cause additional pain to someone who has supposedly already suffered enormously provides psychological pressure against skeptical questioning.

Bourdin understood this dynamic intuitively and exploited it deliberately.