Its findings, in summary, were these.

That Antonia Rask’s conduct in failing to disclose for seven weeks was a serious failure of protective judgment and that it was the central issue in the case.

That there was no evidence whatsoever that she had participated in, arranged, or been present for the transportation of the child, and no evidence that she posed any physical risk to her.

That the child’s attachment to her mother was strong, uncomplicated, and — this is the phrase that reorganized my thinking — “the most protective factor currently present in her life.”