The First Lady, The Podcaster, and a Legal Firestorm: What’s Really Behind Candace Owens’ Boldest Move Yet?
Something about Candace Owens’ latest docuseries didn’t just spark controversy—it lit a match under an international powder keg.
The conservative firebrand, never one to shy away from cultural battles, launched Becoming Brigitte—an eight-part digital exposé that doesn’t just question the identity of France’s First Lady, Brigitte Macron. It accuses her of living an entirely fabricated life.
Owens alleges, without concrete proof, that Brigitte was born male under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, faked her entire history, and is part of a shadowy, deep-state mind control operation. The internet may be familiar with conspiracy-laden rabbit holes—but this one hit a diplomatic nerve.
And now, it’s more than just viral noise. It’s a legal war.
From Podcast to Courtroom
President Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron have responded with legal force, filing a massive defamation lawsuit in Delaware Superior Court—a jurisdiction that notably extends U.S. defamation law beyond borders, given Owens’ American base of operations.
The 218-page legal filing includes 22 counts and demands punitive damages, a jury trial, and a sweeping retraction. It accuses Owens of “malicious defamation under the guise of journalism” and outlines repeated attempts to request a retraction—each one ignored.
Court documents reveal the Macrons sent three formal legal notices starting in December 2024, with the final cease-and-desist issued July 1, 2025. None received a response.
View this post on Instagram
Owens, doubling down in a recent livestream, claimed the lawsuit was a political ploy. “This isn’t about truth,” she said. “This is about silencing voices the global elite find inconvenient.”
Framing herself as a victim of censorship, she argues her content falls under “free inquiry and investigative reporting”—a First Amendment shield, even across international lines.
Not the First Time
This isn’t the first time the Macrons have battled this exact rumor. In 2024, Brigitte Macron sued and initially won a defamation case in a French court against two women—a fringe blogger and a self-styled psychic—who propagated the same theory. That victory was later overturned on appeal, sending the matter to France’s Court of Cassation, the nation’s highest legal body.
But while French courts weighed the issue as a domestic slander case, Owens’ entry elevated the stakes—and globalized the dispute.
High-Stakes Questions in a Hyperconnected Age
This lawsuit raises more than personal stakes—it asks uncomfortable questions about the borderless power of digital media, the limits of press freedom, and how truth and fiction blur when reputation and reach collide.
Critics argue Owens’ series weaponized conspiracy for clicks. Supporters say she’s challenging narratives too often protected by political insulation. But no matter which side you’re on, the implications are profound: What counts as journalism in the influencer era? And when does public speculation cross the line into targeted defamation?
✅ Closing Thoughts: A Global Tangle of Truth, Speech, and Reputation
As the case heads to trial, both Owens and the Macrons are gearing up for a courtroom showdown that could ripple far beyond Delaware. For Owens, it’s a battle over free expression and personal brand power.
For the Macrons, it’s a fight for dignity and truth in an age where viral lies can circle the globe before the truth gets a single headline.
Whatever the verdict, Becoming Brigitte may end up doing more than provoke headlines—it could become a landmark test of how the internet handles truth, freedom, and the fallout of unchecked claims.