Donald Trump Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize Amid Fragile Iran-Israel Ceasefire
Former President Donald Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following his role in brokering a tentative ceasefire between Iran and Israel—an effort hailed by supporters but already showing signs of unraveling.
The nomination, put forth by Representative Buddy Carter, credits Trump with a “historic role” in ending the so-called 12-Day War, though ongoing missile exchanges and conflicting claims from both sides have cast doubt on whether lasting peace has been achieved.
A Ceasefire in Doubt
Even as Carter was writing his glowing endorsement, the fragile truce Trump helped negotiate was faltering. Missiles continued to fly after the ceasefire’s scheduled start, raising a fundamental question: can one truly be awarded a peace prize for ending a conflict that remains unresolved?
The recent flare-up began with Israel launching a preemptive strike, citing concerns over Iran’s advancing nuclear program. Both nations responded with heavy rocket fire, prompting the U.S. to carry out a massive airstrike on Iranian nuclear sites—the largest B-2 bomber raid in U.S. history.
On Monday, Trump declared that hostilities had ceased and announced a truce to begin overnight. Israeli officials welcomed the announcement, stating the nuclear threat had been neutralized. For a brief moment, it appeared Trump had secured a diplomatic win.
The Terms and the Fallout
The ceasefire’s terms were straightforward: Israel would halt attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, Iran would stop launching missiles at Israeli cities, and both sides would suspend hostilities.
Yet, by Tuesday evening, cracks appeared. Iran allegedly launched two ballistic missiles shortly after the ceasefire’s start time, prompting Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz to order retaliation. Iran countered by denying any formal truce agreement had been reached.
During a press briefing, a visibly frustrated Trump commented, “You’ve got two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard, they don’t even know what the f—k they’re doing anymore.” Despite his announcement, violence resumed mere hours later.
Reports surfaced that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu scaled back military retaliation after pressure from Washington, but by then the truce’s credibility had suffered.
#Israel #struck several #nuclear sites in #Iran | 13/06/2025 pic.twitter.com/rtfLgdW6rN
— Maps.Interlude (@Maps_interlude) June 13, 2025
Trump’s Peace Efforts: A Pattern of Controversy
This episode echoes previous challenges faced by Trump’s peace initiatives. His earlier claim of mediating peace between India and Pakistan led to a brief Nobel nomination, quickly followed by condemnation from Pakistan. Similarly, a prior Nobel nomination for mediating the Ukraine conflict was withdrawn amid doubts about his effectiveness.
Trump has openly expressed frustration over never receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, despite his efforts. Last week, he tweeted: “I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, even Russia/Ukraine or Israel/Iran.”
Republican lawmakers remain optimistic. Senator Katie Britt confidently stated, “President Trump is going to win the Nobel Peace Prize. No doubt.” Representative Nancy Mace praised Trump for “achieving what Biden and Obama never could—PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH.”
Currently, Trump is one among 338 nominees for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize.
Can a Broken Truce Earn a Peace Prize?
The question remains: does a short-lived truce merit a Nobel Peace Prize? While Trump’s diplomacy may have temporarily paused intense fighting, the Nobel Committee traditionally rewards durable peace agreements, not ceasefires that collapse almost as soon as they begin.
The final decision won’t be announced until January, leaving the world to wonder if Trump’s intervention will be remembered as a fleeting moment or a genuine breakthrough.
Conclusion:
Donald Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize nomination amid the precarious Iran-Israel ceasefire has sparked intense debate about the nature of peace and the criteria for such an honor. Supporters applaud his “peace through strength” approach, while critics question the sustainability and timing of his achievements. As the ceasefire falters, the nomination’s legacy remains uncertain—highlighting the complex, often nonlinear journey toward lasting peace.