Experts Identify 15 U.S. Cities Most at Risk in a Potential Nuclear Conflict
As global tensions continue to escalate and concerns about the possibility of World War III grow, experts are closely examining which American cities might face the greatest danger in the event of a nuclear strike.
Amid ongoing conflicts, fraught diplomatic relations, and provocative international moves, a nuclear historian has compiled a list of 15 U.S. cities that could be targeted first—ranging from strategic military hubs to major population centers.
Key Insights from Nuclear Historian Alex Wellerstein
Professor Alex Wellerstein of the Stevens Institute of Technology shared his analysis with the Daily Mail, identifying cities at highest risk based on their military significance and symbolic importance.
His assessment comes as global instability continues, with the Russia-Ukraine war ongoing and U.S. actions in the Middle East further heightening tensions.
Wellerstein explained, “If a state actor like Russia aims to cripple U.S. retaliatory capabilities, their focus would likely be on command centers and missile sites. In contrast, a rogue actor or terrorist group might prioritize large population centers.”
Strategic Military Targets
Great Falls, Montana: Though small in population, its proximity to Malmstrom Air Force Base—a critical nuclear missile silo site—places it at risk.
Cheyenne, Wyoming: Home to the Francis E. Warren Air Force Base, a vital nuclear command center.
Ogden & Clearfield, Utah: Together hosting over 120,000 people and near Hill Air Force Base, these cities are part of the nation’s nuclear defense infrastructure.
Shreveport, Louisiana: Near Barksdale Air Force Base, which houses B-52 bombers capable of nuclear deployment.
Omaha, Nebraska: Adjacent to Offutt Air Force Base, a significant military command center.
Colorado Springs, Colorado: Location of NORAD, responsible for continental air defense.
Albuquerque, New Mexico: Kirtland Air Force Base, home to one of the largest U.S. nuclear arsenals.
Honolulu, Hawaii: A key Pacific military outpost, historically significant and strategically important.
Symbolic and Population-Dense Targets
Washington, D.C.: The nation’s capital, central to political and military leadership.
New York City, New York: The largest U.S. city and a global cultural and economic powerhouse.
Los Angeles, California: An international entertainment hub with major strategic value.
Chicago, Illinois: A populous metropolis near vital water resources.
Houston, Texas: A major energy center with over 2.3 million residents.
San Francisco, California: Though lacking direct military facilities, its economic influence and population make it a potential target.
Seattle, Washington: Close to Naval Base Kitsap and a key technology and defense hub.
A Sobering Reminder
This list underscores the dual nature of potential targets in a nuclear conflict—places with critical military installations alongside cities whose symbolic or economic significance make them vulnerable. While the possibility of such a catastrophic event remains theoretical, Wellerstein’s analysis highlights the immense stakes involved.
As the world grapples with rising geopolitical tensions, the focus on these cities serves as a stark reminder of how fragile global peace truly is. It also emphasizes the crucial role of diplomacy, deterrence, and international cooperation in preventing such a devastating conflict.