In just two days, Netflix’s brand new movie “Trigger Warning,” starring Jessica Alba, has amassed a whopping 25.7 million views worldwide.
However, the film sparked a wave of debate among viewers with differing opinions on its merits.
The long-awaited return of Jessica Alba
After a five-year hiatus, Alba makes a triumphant return to the screen in “Trigger Warning” to focus on her successful consumer goods company.
The return of the “Dark Angel” and “Fantastic Four” star has fans excited.
But there was not a uniform response to the film.
Critical reactions vs. audience success of the new Netflix movie
“Trigger Warning” drew a lot of criticism from both critics and audiences, despite its huge viewership. It currently has a terrible 2.0 rating on Letterboxd, an average score of 4.5/10 on IMDb, and a pitiful 21% on Rotten Tomatoes’ Tomatometer. The film’s popularity and critical acclaim stand in stark contrast to these scores.
A Hard Homecoming in the New Netflix Movie
Parker, played by Alba, is a distraught special forces commando who returns to his hometown after the unexpected loss of his father. As she investigates the circumstances of his death and becomes involved with a violent gang, a flurry of action and suspense ensues.
Fans have been vehemently voicing their opinions on social media following the “Trigger Warning” debate.
Some viewers praised Alba’s acting and action scenes in the film and expressed their admiration. An ardent admirer exclaimed: “I adored this movie! “More, more.”
Different reactions and intense discussions
The release of “Trigger Warning” undoubtedly created quite a buzz and marked Jessica Alba’s return to the big screen after a considerable hiatus.
While the film’s viewership numbers are impressive and reflect strong initial interest, the stark contrast to its critical reception raises important questions about audience expectations and the film’s execution.Â
As Alba takes on the role of Parker, a special forces commando dealing with personal loss, viewers are treated to a mixture of action and emotional depth. However, the polarized reactions highlight the divide between general audiences and film critics. While some fans celebrated the film’s intensity and Alba’s performance, others expressed disappointment as seen in the film’s low ratings on various platforms.
This dichotomy suggests that “Trigger Warning” resonates differently with viewers, leading to heated discussions online. While viewers will continue to share their opinions, it will be interesting to see how this dialogue develops and whether it affects the film’s longevity and reputation in the competitive streaming landscape.
Ultimately, “Trigger Warning” serves as a reminder of the complexities of film reception, where popularity and critical acclaim don’t always coincide.