The fact that no one has ever fallen off the “edge” is one of the strongest arguments against the theory that our globe is round rather than flat.
Now we have an explanation from a flat earther as to why that is. Your reaction to the answer will undoubtedly be, “Wait, what?”
Why no one has ever fallen off the edge of the Earth, according to Flat Earther
We now have a large amount of historical data to support the idea that the Earth is round.
Using a telescope, you can observe that the other planets in our solar system are spherical. NASA has photographed Earth from orbit many times, and astronauts have visited the planet in person.
You can even do experiments at home to prove that the Earth is round. Not to mention, as already stated, the fact that no one has ever left the “end of the earth” is the biggest mistake.
Nevertheless, a significant part of the population still holds the opinion that the Earth is flat.
Justification
The claim that NASA, the government, or anyone else is lying to us is contradicted by the images and eyewitness accounts that show the spherical shape of the Earth. Although there are many different explanations, the main ones are power, control, and money.
Finally, Connor Murphy, a noted flat earther, issued an explanation. What prevents someone from dying by falling off the edge of the Earth? “There’s really no edge.
“You know what I mean when I say fall into what? There’s no reserve. That’s not true,” he declared. From our point of view, it appears as a closed system.
The firmament, sometimes known as the dome, is made of water, and the water is above and below it. We can’t leave it, nor is there any antigravity that would allow us to sail and explore other Suns or other objects.”
He continued in the same conversation to explain that Antarctica is really a perimeter and that ice shelves or cliffs keep people from falling. If you get past that, you’ll hit the dome. Primarily
How about airplanes?
If the Earth was flat, we’d be long gone, right? Darren Nesbit, a flat earther, claims this is due to the “Pac-Man effect”
(1) He explains that much like Pac-Man reaches the edge of the screen, the plane teleports back to the other side when it hits the edge of the Earth. My understanding is that this also prevents planes from colliding with the dome as per the above idea.
There are many alternative flat earth ideas when it comes to different aspects of our globe. Among them are (2):
The only real force in nature is electromagnetic; gravity is fiction.
We have not yet found all the empires, regions, and civilizations that exist in the planes of Earth.
Clear as mud
My question to the flat earthers is this: Since humans have been on the planet for a considerable amount of time, why haven’t they climbed over the ice cliff and landed in the “dome” yet? We have cars, trains and planes.
Many tourists have climbed insurmountable peaks. Has anyone in the past tried to peer over the “edge” only to run their head over the dome?
Belief in a flat Earth persists despite overwhelming evidence supporting the Earth’s roundness, from astronomical observations to personal reports from astronauts. Explanations offered by flat earthers such as the “dome” idea or the “Pac-Man Effect” highlight the lengths to which some people will go to maintain perspective even when confronted with conflicting evidence
The persistence of these beliefs raises important questions about how information is processed and how certain ideologies are adopted, even in the face of scientific consensus. The explanations provided by flat earthers often appear more like fanciful stories than established theories, yet they still captivate a section of the population. This highlights a wider problem: the problem of combating misinformation and ensuring that science literacy reaches all corners of society.
Ultimately, the flat earth theory, with its complex and often contradictory rationales, serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and the need for further education in science. It also highlights the human tendency to cling to beliefs that feel comfortable even when they contradict logic and evidence. While it’s easy to dismiss these ideas, they offer a window into the complexity of belief systems and the enduring power of narrative over fact.