President Donald Trump’s health has been a topic of public interest for months.
In October, the 79-year-old visited Walter Reed Military Medical Center for an MRI, with his physician asserting that he is in excellent condition. Yet some experts remain skeptical. Former White House doctor Jeffrey Kuhlman has questioned whether the official account tells the full story.
The visit, reported last month, involved advanced imaging, lab tests, and routine preventive health checks. On October 10, Trump’s physician, Sean Barbabella, released a statement indicating that all lab results were “exceptional,” and that his metabolic, blood, and heart health metrics were stable. During the appointment, Trump also received his annual flu shot and an updated COVID-19 booster. Barbabella highlighted that Trump’s “cardiac age”—a measure of heart health based on ECG readings—was roughly 14 years younger than his actual age, underscoring his overall strong cardiovascular health.
Trump himself shared details with reporters on Air Force One, stating that the MRI results were “perfect” and “some of the best reports for the age” that doctors had ever seen. Despite being among the oldest presidents in U.S. history, he did not clarify why the MRI was performed. While the White House presented the visit as routine, some medical professionals question whether there is more to the story.
Jeffrey Kuhlman, who served as physician under Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama, expressed concern over the timing of the visit. He noted that the short helicopter ride from the South Lawn to Walter Reed left enough time for tests that could have been completed at the White House in just 15 minutes. Kuhlman described the situation as a “disconnect,” suggesting the official explanation may not capture the full context.
In summary, although official statements portray President Trump’s health as excellent, questions persist. The recent Walter Reed visit, along with expert skepticism, has fueled speculation about what details may remain undisclosed. The controversy highlights how closely presidential health is monitored and how quickly uncertainty can spark public debate.