Failed Censure Vote Exposes Divisions Over Rep. LaMonica Mclver
What was expected to be a routine censure vote in the House quickly became a political flashpoint, revealing fractures within the Republican Party and sparking debate over accountability, due process, and political strategy.
A resolution to formally reprimand Rep. LaMonica Mclver (D-N.J.) fell short this week after five House Republicans joined Democrats in blocking the measure. Introduced by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.),
the resolution sought to publicly censure Mclver and remove her from the Homeland Security Committee following her indictment for an alleged May altercation outside an immigration detention facility.
The three-page resolution accused Mclver of conduct that “does not reflect creditably on the House” and argued her continued committee service created “a significant conflict of interest.” Notably, it did not call for her removal from the Small Business Committee.
The Republican defections included Don Bacon and Mike Flood of Nebraska, Dave Joyce and Mike Turner of Ohio, and David Valadao of California. Two others, Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.) and Nathaniel Moran (R-Texas), voted “present.” Bacon later explained he preferred allowing the Ethics Committee to complete its investigation, while Turner’s office said his vote had been cast in error — a mistake that ultimately did not alter the outcome.
Mclver’s indictment stems from an oversight visit at Newark’s Delaney Hall immigration facility, where she was reportedly involved in a confrontation with ICE officers during the arrest of the city’s mayor — charges against the mayor were later dropped. Acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba alleges that Mclver struck one ICE officer with her forearm, grabbed him forcefully, and struck another agent with her arms. If convicted, Mclver could face up to 17 years in prison. Video footage circulating online appears to show her making physical contact with an officer, including a strike from behind, though Mclver denies the allegations.
Conclusion
The failed censure vote highlights the growing tension within the Republican Party over handling high-profile cases involving sitting members of Congress. Some lawmakers insist immediate disciplinary action is warranted, while others argue that investigations and court proceedings must play out first.
With video evidence, legal proceedings, and a contentious trial looming, the political and ethical fallout of Mclver’s case is far from resolved. Both parties may soon face difficult questions about accountability, the role of the Ethics Committee, and the message Congress sends when members are accused of misconduct.