Given that the fires of fires continued to devast in California, many inhabitants found themselves unimaginable.
Among the affected people is the Hollywood Mel Gibson icon, who at the age of 69 experienced the complete destruction of his beloved house in Malibu.Yet, when the ashes of what was once a large property, Gibson’s story serves not only as a personal tragedy, but as a strong reminder of vulnerability and the richest and most famous.
While the fires were raging its neighborhood, not only its own home, but also the others, including the other celebrities, is much more than just a loss of property – it is a deep, ongoing crisis that California faces these persistent fires, and the failure of local leadership to deal with a growing threat.
Mel Gibson, 69 -year -old Hollywood actor, tragically lost his California home in devastating fire Palisades. The house where Gibson and his family lived for 15 years were destroyed by a fire that broke out when he was in Austin in Texas, and filmed an episode of the experience Joe Rogan.
The fire quickly spread throughout Gibson’s neighborhood and absorbed the houses on its way, as the BBC says. Fortunately, before the flames came to their property, Gibson’s long -time partner, Rosalind Ross and their seven -year -old son, Lars Gerard Gibson, were able to evacuate safely.
Gibson was aware of the danger of fire when he spoke to Joe Rogan and mentioned that his area was “on fire”. He also expressed frustration with insufficient response to Governor California Gavin Newsoma and noted, “I think all our tax dollars probably went to Gavin’s hair gel.”
When Gibson returned to California, he was destroyed to find that his property of Malibu of $ 14.5 million was completely destroyed by fire. He described his reaction in an interview with Elizabeth Vargas about the news of the news: “I thought,” Eh, I wonder if my place is still there. “
For years, Gibson has tried to sell his expansion assets and even reduced the required price by $ 3 million. The five -room headquarters, built in 1996, were purchased by Gibson in 2008 for $ 11.5 million. The property, which had a turret similar to the castle and the magic of the Old World, was a significant loss.
While the destruction was traumatic, Gibson expressed gratitude that his family was immature. “I can’t go back a lot of my personal belongings that were there,” he said. “Many items, including pictures, documents, and only the personal things I have accumulated over the years, as well as clothing – they are fine, but all can be replaced. These are just things. The good news is that everyone in my family is good, safe and out of damage.
Gibson described the level of devastation in his neighborhood, unlike everything he had ever seen. He mentioned that other celebrities like Ed Harris could also lose their homes along with Paris Hilton and Billy Crystal. “It was completely roasted,” Gibson said about his own property. He also explained the situation and joked: “At least I don’t have to deal with the unpleasant installation problems.” He added, “It’s amazing that my chickens have survived.”
Many Californians have influenced ongoing fires, including important individuals such as Gibson. This disaster serves as a sharp reminder of the ongoing crisis of the State Fire.
In an interview with Fox News Gibson criticized the answer of the local authorities and said, “Obviously some people slept at work, especially our leaders. That’s something they will have to answer. Children suffer from trauma. Someone has to take responsibility.”
In conclusion, the heartbreaking loss of Mel Gibson from his home Malibu to the devastating palisades of the fire emphasizes the widespread impact of the ongoing crisis in California, which affects both ordinary citizens and celebrities. While the destruction of its property of $ 14.5 million was traumatic, Gibson remains grateful for the safety of his family and emphasizes the importance of human life before material property.
His criticism of the local leadership reflects frustration that many feel in terms of lack of reasonable response to crisis. This tragic event serves as a reminder of vulnerability that faces communities in areas susceptible to fire and an urgent need for better readiness and responsibility to solve problems with the fire fire.