Following the devastating LA fires, actor Mel Gibson caused controversy with the theory of increasing eyebrows, which has left many questioning its credibility.
Gibson, known for his open opinions, has never been thrown away to express his opinions, but his recent comments on fires raised bets.
As one of the many victims of destruction, the lost of his house in Malibu of £ 12 million, he has transformed his grief into a wild speculation platform, suggesting that the flames may be darker and more intention.
His claim has aroused not only confusion, but also a wave of will, because many wonder if his words are the result of emotional anxiety or something more calculated.
Actor Mel Gibson shared his own theory of LA fires, which many people left confused.
Malibu’s home at £ 12 million Mad Max was destroyed in fires and his comments after the incident caused resistance.
“I can come up with various disturbing theories – conspiracy theories and others – but it seemed too comfortable, that there was no water,” he said. “And that wind conditions were perfect, with people seemingly prepared and capable of starting fires.” He suggested that devastation could be “intentionally planned” to clean homes from a valuable country.
After the news broke that the suspect was arrested in connection with the start of one of the fires, Gibson asked whether the person had acted alone or whether it was “entrusted” to start the fire. He noted, “They look pretty well equipped, some of these people they catch.”
He also expressed concern about the news of water shortage and noted, “I know they manipulated water and let the reserves go for some reason.” He added: “California has many problems that are hard to understand in terms of decision -making.”
Gibson continued: “In such situations, you ask if it’s intentional. It’s a crazy thought, but one can’t help but wonder if it’s for that purpose. What is their agenda?
His remarks caused controversy, and many criticized him on social media. One user wrote: “Conspiracy theories seem to be his latest claim for glory.” Others commented: “While people in California are fighting fires, these two are busy founding.” The third added: “Shame”.
Ingraham, a host of Fox News, noted that there were discussions about the potential of high density housing in areas affected by fire. Gibson compared the situation with “old barons of cattle who cleaned people from the ground”.
Conclusion
Mel Gibson’s controversial comments on LA fires have made a significant debate. While its conspiracy theories of fires that are intentionally organized for soil development may be considered attractive, they emphasize ongoing frustrations from the management of natural disasters in California. The actor’s notes have evoked criticism from many who believe they are spreading unfounded theories in times of crisis.
However, Gibson’s questions about larger fire questions – including the task of water and soil deficiency – have made some of them to think about the complexity of the situation. In the end, whether someone agrees with his perspective, he emphasizes a greater conversation about responsibility, environmental politicians and forces that shape such devastating events.