In the middle of the devastation caused by the recent LA fires, one of the most open characters in Hollywood, Mel Gibson, caused an extensive discussion with its controversial theory of Plan’s origin.
While many of them are still struggling with the complete range of destruction, the actor who lost his £ 12 million in Infernos, increased his eyebrows with his provocative claims.
Was the destruction of the fire truly a natural disaster, or could it be all the darker and more intention force behind it? This theory left many confused and other outraged. Here is a closer look at Gibson’s comments and the reaction they have enraged.
Mad Max’s star lost £ 12 million in the fires, provoking a reaction that caused the will.
Actor Mel Gibson shared his own theory of La fires and left many people confused.
Mad Max’s star lost £ 12 million in the fires, which caused an answer that provoked controversy.
“I could come up with various wild theories in my head – conspiracy theories and everything else – but it seemed too comfortable that there was no water,” Gibson said. “The wind conditions were right and were prepared, willing and able to start fires.” He suggested that the destruction could be “planned” to clean valuable soil for development.
After the reports have emerged that the suspect was arrested in connection with the commencement of one of the fires, Gibson asked whether a person whose identity remains unpublished, acts independently or whether it was “entrusted” to carry out that law.
“They seem to be quite well equipped, some people who catch,” he said. “I know they played with water supply and let the reserves go for reasons I don’t understand,” Gibson added in a recent interview with Laura Ingraham Fox News at an angle Ingraham. “California has many problems that are difficult to understand, especially when it comes to decision -making.”
He continued: “And when such events happen, you start to be surprised – it is intentionally? Sounds madly to think, but one cannot help but wonder if there is an agenda. What would it be?
His statement caused strong reactions, and some people expressed distrust.
“Conspiracy theories seem to be its last claim to fame,” one Twitter user wrote. “While people in California are fighting fires, the two are busy,” another said. “Shame,” he posted the third.
Ingraham mentioned that in the areas of the affected fires talked about housing with high density, while Gibson compared the situation with “old barons cattle that pushes people out of the ground”.
What are your thoughts on it?
In conclusion, the controversial notes of Mel Gibson have caused a heated debate about La fires, and its conspiracy theories increased the eyebrows and fuel division. While some are confused by his claims, others are biased by the possibilities of hidden programs during the game. Regardless of the validity of the theory, it emphasizes continuing frustration and concerns about California’s natural disasters and wider problems of soil development.
The discussion also underlines the complexity of the balance of reaction to disasters with economic and environmental considerations. As the story happens, it is clear that these fires and theories that surround them have attracted the attention of the public and continued to expand the conversation.
Share this article with family and Facebook friends.
Bored dad
Love and peace