Redditor Entensmarts Dinner Freeloaders so all stunned
We were all there – they were attracted to a group dinner, where one or two people were shamelessly taking advantage of benefits, ordering the most expensive dishes and expecting others to charge the account.
Most of us are either disturbed or avoiding these situations completely. One Reddit user, however, decided to play the game differently and made the move so unexpected that they left his friends without words – and some seriously angry.
The story unfolds:
The 27-year-old Reddit has shared their experience with a long-term group of friends with about eight people. Among them, two members – Susan and Greg – had a reputation for the use of group meals. Whenever they went out, the duo ordered extravagant dishes and later blamed others for covering their share, using apologies for their financial fighting.
Last weekend, Dan, another friend, the Redditor invited dinner for dinner. Initially, they refused and explained that they would not participate if there were Susan and Greg. Dan, however, urged them to come and asked them to postpone their frustration for one night.
Once in the restaurant, the group began to assign their orders. Most of them spent around $ 40 on their meals, but Susan and Greg were predictably out of all and ordered meals that were around $ 200. When he was on order, they made to order, did something unexpected – they only went to drink $ 4 and sent the waiter away. Two other friends followed suit, canceled their food orders, and instead chose drinks.
As the main courses arrived, Susan and Greg seemed noticeably unpleasant. Then came the moment of truth – account. Greg immediately signaled the waiter to divide the check between six guests. However, Redditor refused and insisted that every person should pay for what they ordered. Greg looked confused and claimed to “always” divide the account. Redditor reminded him that three of them did not eat any food, so they would only cover their drinks.
Finally, Dan – who ordered food worth about $ 50 – left with an unexpected account of $ 146.98. His stunned reaction was unforgettable. Meanwhile, the Redditor simply paid $ 10 and went out.
Fallout:
The following morning, the Redditor woke up to a flood of angry texts from Greg and Susan and accused them of forcing them to pay more than expected. Ironically, their own dear decision was more than if the account was divided evenly.
Dan also sent a message, frustrated that Redditor came just to pull this stuntman instead of simply skipping dinner.
When the story was shared online, the reaction was tremendously in favor of Redditor events. Most commentators agreed that Susan and Greg were finally responsible for their free-loading methods, which proves that sometimes the best way to deal with Moochers is to turn the tables on them.
Here is a reformulated version of the article:
Reddit User Enorrts Dinner Freeloaders, leaving every shocked.
When dining with friends, the distribution of the account can be complicated – should everyone pay their fair share or the costs should be evenly distributed even if the orders differ? Although there is no universal answer, the unexpected movement of one reditor in a group dinner caused a heated reaction.
Story:
The 27-year-old Reddit has shared their experience with a long-term group of friends with about eight people. Among them, two members – Susan and Greg – had the habit of ordering the most beautiful meals and then apologizing about their finances to avoid paying a fair share. The rest of the group often ended in coverage of the difference.
One weekend Dan, another friend, was invited by the Redditor for dinner. Initially, they refused and stated that they would not participate if there were Susan and Greg. Dan, however, convinced them to come and ask them to postpone their feelings for the night.
Once in the restaurant, the group began to assign their orders. Most members spent about $ 40 on their meals, but Susan and Greg ordered extravagant meals, each of which was around $ 200. When he was on the order of the Redditor, they surprised everyone by asking only for a drink of $ 4 and claiming to have lost their appetite. Two other friends followed suit, canceled their orders, and decided only for drinks.
As her food arrived, Susan and Greg looked restless. When the bill came, Greg asked the waiter to distribute him evenly among six guests. Redditor, however, quickly protested and insisted that each person pay for what he ordered. Greg was visibly confused and claimed to “always” divide the account. Redditor, however, pointed out that three of them did not eat any food, so they would only cover their drinks.
Finally, Dan – who ordered $ 50 food – left with a shocking account $ 146.98. His stunned reaction was unforgettable. Meanwhile, the rRedditorsimply paid $ 10 for his drink and went out.
Aftermath:
The following morning, the Redditor woke up to a flood of angry texts from Greg and Susan and accused them of forcing them to pay more than expected. With regard to their extravagant orders, however, Redditor considered his complaints fun.
Dan also sent messages and expressed frustration that the Redditor only took part in the stuntman’s pulling out. He claimed that they should simply refuse the invitation instead of leaving it with an unexpectedly large card.
When the story was shared online, the reaction was tremendously in favor of the Redditor events, and most of the commentators agreed that Susan and Greg finally got what they deserved.
Would you like more clarification?
In the end, this situation emphasized the common dilemma in dining in groups – how to quite divide the account. While some could see the Redditor’s actions, as calculated, many believed it was a justified reaction to the repeated exploitation of their friends Greg and Susan. Their strategies not only revealed the injustice of the usual arrangement but also forced the group to reconsider how shared expenses can be handled. Although Dan was frustrated by things, this incident can serve as a wake-up call for all involved, as evidence that sometimes when they stand up for justice, it comes with unexpected consequences.