As the lively fire coverage in Los Angeles developed, the seemingly small detail caused a wave of online discussion and attracted more attention than the catastrophic events themselves.
The viewers who tuned to broadcast ABC quickly saw something special about the appearance of David Muira-DVA wooden garments attached to the back of its flame-retho -ard jacket.
The view of these pegs led to a commotion on the social media, and many accused the anchor of favoring his appearance over the grave situation at hand. This was followed by a mixture of mockery, confusion and sharp criticism, with some questioning of the professionalism of a seasoned journalist. But the truth behind ° Cleapins was much lighter than it seemed.
During the lively coverage of the devastating fires in Los Angeles, David Muir ABC found himself on Wednesday’s storm of social media.
The controversy broke out when viewers with sharp eyes noticed two wooden fabric cord attached to the back of his flame resistant jacket. This unusual detail led to the accusation that Muir was more interested in his appearance than the seriousness of the crisis.
Social media broke out quickly, with reactions from criticism to ridicule. Among these comments was Jack Osbourne, who joined the discussion. Other news, however, explained that the ° Cleapins was not the choice of fashion, but a practical repair at the last minute. The producer reportedly added them to secure Muir’s jacket against strong winds just before he went to the air.
Los Angeles fires, driven by winds of up to 100 km / h, ravaged 42 square miles and forced more than 130,000 people to evacuate. In the middle of chaos Muir released his usual polished report, although he briefly warned the view of the ° Cleapins from his coverage.
Later broadcasts showed Muira without ° Cleachins, probably after the conditions. While online will emphasized that intensive inspection of public persons they face also stressed that reporters would withstand difficult conditions when they cover real -time disasters.
Finally, the incident with David Muir and clothing serves as a reminder of intense pressure that journalists face when reporting in the middle of a disaster. While the public control of the smallest details about the appearance of the reporter may seem trivial in the face of the crisis, it emphasizes constant judgment and high expectations placed on those who are in the center of attention.
As Muir’s experience shows, even the most well -intentioned efforts to maintain peace and professionalism in chaotic circumstances can become a subject of controversy. Finally, it emphasizes the need for understanding and empathy for reporters who are tirelessly working to inform the public, often under demanding and unpredictable conditions.