Whoopi Goldberg’s Call to Invoke 25th Amendment Sparks Political Firestorm After Trump’s UN Speech
What began as a straightforward political critique rapidly escalated into a heated controversy when Whoopi Goldberg, co-host of The View, publicly suggested invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office.
The trigger? What Goldberg described as an “unhelpful” and divisive speech by Trump at the United Nations General Assembly, which she argued undermined the United States’ credibility on the world stage.
During a Wednesday broadcast, Goldberg expressed deep concern about Trump’s leadership, saying other global leaders no longer take the U.S. seriously following his address. “He had the chance to make a meaningful impact, but he blew it. The world’s lost respect,” she remarked.
Pushing the conversation further, Goldberg floated the idea of using the 25th Amendment—the constitutional provision allowing for presidential removal if deemed unfit—as a potential remedy. “If Joe Biden had spoken like this, I would be saying the same thing. This was neither presidential nor helpful,” she declared.
Her fellow View co-hosts, including Sunny Hostin, backed her critique. Hostin accused Trump of fabricating claims about resolving seven major global conflicts in pursuit of a Nobel Peace Prize, further questioning the veracity of his speech.
Social media quickly ignited with reactions from supporters and detractors alike. Defenders of Trump criticized Goldberg’s comments as politically motivated and misunderstood. “The 25th Amendment is not for political disagreements,” one user wrote. Others pointed to Goldberg’s silence during earlier years of controversy surrounding Trump’s health and capacity, accusing her of inconsistency.
Trump’s UN speech itself was a focal point of contention. His address was fiery and at times confrontational—questioning the role of the United Nations, accusing it of enabling an “assault on Western countries” via mass migration, and calling for an end to open borders.
Technical glitches, including a teleprompter malfunction and a broken escalator during his entrance with First Lady Melania Trump, added an awkward tone to the event. Goldberg’s claim that the audience laughed at rather than with Trump added to the fraught atmosphere.
Conclusion
Goldberg’s call for the 25th Amendment has stirred an intense debate about the boundaries of political criticism and the influence of media voices in public discourse. Her remarks underscore the frustration many feel over Trump’s leadership style but also reveal the deep partisan divisions that make any talk of constitutional measures highly contentious.
The episode shines a light on how polarizing political dialogue has become, particularly when it intersects with constitutional law and media commentary. Meanwhile, Trump’s divisive UN appearance continues to fuel questions about the future of U.S. leadership on the global stage.