North Carolina Lawmaker Faces Backlash Over Controversial Guillotine Video
A single social media post has sparked fierce debate across North Carolina, leaving Representative Julie von Haefen at the center of controversy.
The Democratic lawmaker faces widespread criticism after a protest video circulated online showing a guillotine with a head resembling former President Donald Trump—prompting urgent discussions about political decorum, public responsibility, and the line between protest and incitement.
The video, filmed during a Raleigh “No Kings” demonstration, quickly drew attention for its provocative imagery.
Von Haefen, reacting to the backlash, deactivated her social media accounts and apologized, saying she had edited the footage to remove the violent content. “I condemn political violence in all forms,” she stated, attempting to distance herself from the graphic depiction.
Despite the apology, critics have been relentless. N.C. GOP Chairman Jason Simmons argued that her actions displayed poor judgment, calling for her resignation. House Speaker Destin Hall described the video as “disgraceful” and particularly concerning given its timing—just days after a gunman attacked lawmakers in Minnesota. “Glorifying violence against political opponents, including the President, crosses a dangerous line,” Hall added.
Local leaders have also weighed in. Apex Mayor Jacques Gilbert criticized the imagery for deepening political divisions, while conservative commentators across social media amplified calls for von Haefen’s removal. Viral posts condemned the lawmaker for linking controversial policy stances to violent symbolism, with some arguing that accountability at the state level is essential.
As the debate unfolds, questions linger over whether von Haefen will resign or receive support from her party. The incident has become a flashpoint, illustrating how quickly provocative content can ignite widespread outrage and threaten public trust in elected officials.
Conclusion
The controversy surrounding Julie von Haefen highlights the precarious balance elected officials must maintain in a hyper-connected digital age. Even a brief lapse in judgment—intentional or not—can escalate into a full-blown political crisis. While von Haefen’s apology seeks to quell the uproar, the incident underscores the lasting consequences of politically charged imagery and the heightened scrutiny facing public figures in today’s polarized climate.