In a surprising and highly controversial step, former President Donald Trump announced on Sunday evening that he was managing the prison office along with the Ministry of Justice, the FBI and internal security to reopen the infamous prison of Alcatraz, which has been closed for more than 60 years.
The once-imprinter, known as “The Rock”, is not only a symbol of the last American system of imprisonment of the American, but also a place associated with some of the most famous criminals in history.
However, Trump’s sudden challenges for the resurrection of the institution raise significant questions. Is it just another political stuntman focused on its base, or is it a serious attempt to rework the criminal judiciary system?
When Trump seeks to re -open this long -term facility, critics and experts increase eyebrows to the financial, logistic and symbolic consequences of such a bold move.
On Sunday evening, former President Donald Trump announced on Sunday evening that the prison office in cooperation with the Ministry of Justice, the FBI and internal security to reopen and expand Alcatraz – notorious island prison, which has been closed for more than 60 years.
“For too long, America has been burdened with violent, recurring perpetrators, the lowest elements of society who contribute nothing but suffering and destruction,” Trump wrote.
“In the past, when our nation was more decisive, we did not hesitate to lock the most dangerous criminals and keep them far from those they could hurt. So it should be,” he continued.
Trump also said: “That is why I manage the prison office in cooperation with the Ministry of Justice, the FBI and internal security to reopen and significantly expand Alcatraz to accommodate the most brutal and violent criminals in America.”
This announcement is the latest Trump initiative to transform, how and where federal prisoners and immigration are imprisoned.
He made it clear that the selection of Alcatraz was intentional, and emphasized the prison notorious history of the housing of notorious criminals, such as Al Capone and George “machine gun” Kelly.
“Rebuild and open alcatraz!” Trump said. “We will no longer tolerate these serial perpetrators who spread dirt, bloodshed and chaos on the streets.”
Trump also criticized what he described as lenient judicial policies: “Criminals, criminals and judges who are afraid to do their work, and allow us to illegally enter the hostages.”
“The reopening of Alcatraz will be a symbol of law, order and justice. We will make America great again!” closed.
Trump’s ambitious plan, however, faces significant logistics and financial challenges. Alcatraz Island, located in San Francisco Bay, was closed in 1963, not because of the infamous escape, but because of the costs. At that time, it required \ $ $ 3- 5 million to remain functional and three times more expensive than other prisons. For example, water had to be sent – outside a million gallons per week – and the daily costs of prisoners were $ 10.10, compared to only $ 3 in other devices such as the Atlanta USP.
Restoring prison would require extensive improvements in infrastructure, modern security systems and significant investments – all on a remote island, which is currently managed by the National Park, which has changed it in the main tourist destination and a national historical monument.
The spokesman of the Presidium confirmed that the agency would follow the President’s order, but did not comment on how – or if – this plan is feasible.
Former House spokesman Nancy Pelosi has sharply criticized this proposal and stressed that Alcatraz became a popular national park and a tourist attraction. “The president’s proposal is not serious,” she wrote on X.
In conclusion, while the directive of former President Trump is emphasizing the re -opening and expanding of Alcatraz as a prison, he emphasizes his strong attitude to criminal judiciary and his obligation to fight violent perpetrators, also raises significant issues concerning feasibility and practicality.
The logistic and financial calls to restore such an iconic website, along with its current status of popular tourist destination, seem to appear to be more symbolic than realistic. Critics, including the former Lecturer House Nancy Pelosi, have already expressed doubts about the seriousness of the plan and pointed to historical and financial obstacles.
However, Trump’s emphasis on law and order, along with his challenge to stricter judicial policies, continues to resonate with his supporters within his wider vision of the reform of criminal judiciary. Whether this vision is or not, the proposal serves as a bold statement of a direction that the nation should deal with the solution of crime and public security.