It has been almost 30 years since the tragic death of Princess Diana, but questions about events that led to this fateful night still persecute much.
Was it an inevitable accident, or were there critical incorrect steps that could change the course of history? Ken Wharfe, a former Diana bodyguard, believes that her fate has sealed three main security failures.
While some argue that these attacks were mere coincidences, others suspect that the truth has been overshadowed for years of speculation and conflicting messages. Looking again at the scary details of that night, Wharfe’s revelation can throw the light on what really went wrong, and let us think: were they out of simple mistakes?
Ken Wharfe, a former Bodyguard of Princess Diana, believes that three main security lunges played a key role in her tragic death.
It is difficult to believe that almost 30 years have passed since Princess Diana’s early passage. The world not only lost icon and humanitarian, but also two young boys lost their mother. We cannot help, but we are wondering what her life would be today – what role she would play and how the world would continue to affect.
Dangerous driver behind the wheel
Ken Wharfe, who served as an officer of personal protection Diana between 1987 and 1993, remembers it kindly and believes that Diana can still be alive with various decisions.
One of the most important mistakes, according to Wharfe, was the selection of the driver on the fateful night of August 1997.
Diana was in the car with her boyfriend, Egyptian film producer DODIM Fayed, head of the security of the hotel Ritz Henri Paul (who managed), and Dodi Bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, who was the only surviving accident.
Unfortunately, Paul drank before he took the bike and rode at a dangerous speed when the car collided with the 13th pillar of the Pont de l’alma tunnel in Paris. Wharfe believes that if someone else was driving, Diana may have survived.
A fatal attempt to avoid paparazzi
Diana and Dodi’s initial plan were to travel just off the Ritz Hotel to the apartment near Champs-Elysées. One of the key mistakes at night, however, was the lack of coordination and communication with the local police about the car’s journey.
Wharfe believes that the tragedy could be completely prevented if the Diana and Dodi security team worked with local authorities rather than treating them as opponents. In an effort to avoid paparazzi, they created a bait plan. The Range Rover was parked in front of Ritz with the usual Dodi driver behind the wheel, while Diana and Dodi got through his back in the black armored Mercedes.
Henri Paul, who was seriously intoxicated, was called from home to drive a couple. The following high -speed persecution, which reached a speed of almost 60 mph, ended with a fatal accident.
Absence of a security team
Wharfe also quotes the decision of Diana to end her security team Scotland as the biggest mistake that can be preceded. After her separation by Prince Charles in 1992 she decided to give up her royal protection.
Despite the Wharfe’s warning, Diana burned her entire security team just four weeks later. She is convinced that if Queen Elizabeth insisted that Diana had maintained protection, she agreed.
Diana shocked the world and dominated the news for weeks. Her funeral became a historical moment of grief, while the scary images of her dissolved car persisted in memories of many.
Even more than two decades later, the debate continues what could prevent Diana’s death. For Ken Wharfe, however, the answer is clear: the three key decisions that night closed her fate. Do you agree to its evaluation?
Conclusion
In the years since the tragic death of Princess Diana, the world continued to face a deep loss of an icon whose impact was felt far behind the royal family. Reflection of Ken Wharfe about critical mistakes at night plunged new light on the events around her passage.
From the decision to allow a drunk driver behind the wheel to lack cooperation with local authorities and finally her decision to reject her royal security detail, these decisions formed the narration of this fateful evening. While the debate about what could be done differently will last, it is clear that the convergence of these mistakes eventually concluded Dian’s fate.
As we remember her legacy, we cannot help, but we wonder how different things could be if these fundamental decisions were made differently. Would she be with us today? It is a question that continues to chase those who admire it and leave us a feeling of what it could be.