In a surprising turnover, the US Senate recently voted on blocking a bold attempt to stop a large arms agreement with Israel, a decision that triggered an intensive debate on both sides of the aisle.
The proposed sale, which includes stunning weapons of $ 20 billion, raised alarms in the middle of the growing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Given that voices grow louder about concerns from a devastating toll on civilians, does it remain a question:
Does the US government close through the blind eyes of its foreign policy? Senator Bernie Sanders and several colleagues have submitted a solution to this controversial agreement, but their efforts have encountered resistance.
However, this step towards blocking weapons has set fire to a hard debate that exceeds policy, affects human rights, international law and the actual cost of military support.
The US Senate recently voted on blocking efforts aimed at stopping the sale of some US weapons to Israel, after fear of a growing humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Senator Bernie Sanders led the initiative and introduced a joint resolution of disagreement to prevent Israel from from the proposed sale of weapons of $ 20 billion. However, the resolution was unable to obtain the necessary support and only about 20 votes out of 100 senators.
Sanders criticized Israeli ongoing military operations in Gaza, which resulted in more than 43,000 deaths, and accused the US of participation for its continuous delivery of weapons. He pointed out that US law prohibits military assistance by the intersection of human rights violations.
Despite this, Biden Administration continued to transfers of weapons, even after Israel missed the term stored by the US to increase humanitarian aid in Gaza.
Senators, such as Elizabeth Warren, supported resolutions and emphasized the need to detain Israel responsible and ensure that US actions reflect its laws and values.
Democratic senator Jeff Merley also opposed the transfer of weapons used in bomber campaigns that caused widespread destruction and significant loss of life. The humanitarian situation in Gaza remains terrible, with more than 65% housing and the necessary infrastructure destroyed, and 90% of Palestinians are displaced, according to UN reports.
Although this attempt to block weapons sales was unsuccessful, its aim was to express the disagreement of Israeli politicians and put pressure on Israel and Biden administration to solve the deteriorating crisis in Gaza.
In conclusion, while the Senate decision to block a resolution aimed at stopping weapons sales to Israel is a failure for those who require greater responsibility, emphasizes the ongoing debate surrounding the US foreign policy, human rights and humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The resolution fails emphasizes the complexity of balancing geopolitical alliances with the need to observe human rights and international law.
As the situation in Gaza is getting worse, it is clear that the pressure on the responsibility and re -evaluation of the US involvement will remain in the foreground of political discussions, while supporters and critics seek to influence the advance.