As international relationships grow increasingly strained and global headlines carry an undercurrent of unease, an uncomfortable thought has begun to surface for many: what happens if diplomacy collapses altogether?
History shows that large-scale wars rarely announce themselves clearly before they erupt. Instead, they emerge suddenly, leaving everyday people unprepared and searching for safety. While most hope such a catastrophe never materializes, the possibility of a worldwide conflict raises a pressing question—are there still places on Earth that could offer refuge if everything spiraled out of control?
If a global war were to break out, safety would no longer be defined by borders alone. The most secure locations would likely be those far removed from military infrastructure, political influence, and strategic alliances. Areas with natural isolation, political neutrality, and the ability to sustain their populations independently would stand the best chance of avoiding the worst consequences.
Although no location could be completely untouched by worldwide instability, some regions are far better positioned than others. Based on geographic distance, neutrality, and self-reliance, the following ten places are often considered among the safest if a global conflict were to erupt.
1. New Zealand
Geographic isolation is one of New Zealand’s greatest strengths. Located far from major continents and global power centers, it has minimal involvement in international military disputes. Its economy is heavily supported by agriculture, and the country generates a significant portion of its energy from renewable sources such as hydro and geothermal power. With political stability, low population density, and limited strategic value, New Zealand is frequently cited as one of the most resilient locations during global crises.
2. Switzerland
Switzerland’s long-standing commitment to neutrality has allowed it to avoid direct involvement in major wars for generations. Its mountainous landscape provides natural protection, while its infrastructure is famously prepared for emergencies, including extensive civilian shelters. The country maintains strong food production, stable governance, and a population accustomed to preparedness. These factors combine to make Switzerland one of the most defensible and self-sustaining nations in times of global conflict.
3. Iceland
Isolated in the North Atlantic, Iceland’s location alone makes it an unlikely target. The country does not maintain a standing army and holds little strategic military value. Its energy infrastructure is almost entirely renewable, relying on geothermal and hydropower. With a small population, limited geopolitical influence, and minimal exposure to global power struggles, Iceland’s remoteness could offer significant protection during a worldwide war.
4. Antarctica
Though not a permanent home to civilians, Antarctica represents extreme isolation unlike anywhere else on Earth. Governed by international treaty, it is free of military bases and national borders. The harsh environment and lack of infrastructure make it impractical for warfare or occupation. While survival there would require extensive preparation and resources, its distance from global conflict zones could shield it from direct attacks.
5. Argentina
Located far from the world’s primary political and military centers, Argentina benefits from both distance and natural resources. The country is a major agricultural producer and is largely capable of feeding its population independently. With limited involvement in global military alliances and vast, sparsely populated regions—particularly in the south—Argentina offers geographic and strategic insulation from large-scale conflict.
6. Ireland
Ireland’s policy of military neutrality has kept it largely separate from international conflicts in modern history. Positioned on Europe’s western edge, it sits away from many strategic targets found on the continent. The country has access to fertile farmland, clean water, and stable institutions. Its diplomatic approach and lack of heavy military infrastructure reduce the likelihood of becoming a focal point in a global war.
7. Canada (Rural and Northern Areas)
While Canada’s major cities could be affected due to international alliances, its vast interior tells a different story. Large portions of the country are sparsely populated, rich in freshwater, forests, and arable land. These remote regions are difficult to access and offer the resources necessary for long-term survival. Distance, scale, and natural abundance make parts of Canada a potential refuge during widespread global unrest.
8. Pacific Island Nations
Small island nations such as Tuvalu, Samoa, and Kiribati possess little military or industrial significance. Their isolation in the Pacific Ocean and lack of armed forces make them unlikely targets in a global conflict. Although access to supplies could become challenging, their distance from major geopolitical interests also shields them from direct military threats.
9. Bhutan
High in the Himalayas, Bhutan has intentionally remained detached from global power struggles. The nation prioritizes peace, sustainability, and local self-sufficiency over military expansion. Its rugged terrain makes access difficult, and its avoidance of international alliances reduces strategic interest. These factors could help insulate Bhutan from the direct consequences of a worldwide conflict.
10. Chile
Stretching along South America’s western edge, Chile benefits from natural barriers including the Andes Mountains and the Pacific Ocean. The country maintains political stability and produces much of its own food and energy. Remote regions, particularly in the south, are difficult to reach and sparsely populated. Combined with limited involvement in global military disputes, these qualities make Chile a relatively secure option during global upheaval.
Final Thoughts
While the hope remains that a third world war never becomes reality, history reminds us how quickly global conditions can shift. Identifying regions that are better positioned to withstand worldwide instability is not about fear—it’s about understanding resilience.
The places listed here share key characteristics: distance from power centers, limited military importance, and the ability to function independently. Absolute safety may not exist in a global conflict, but some locations are undeniably better prepared than others. In uncertain times, awareness and foresight can be powerful tools for peace of mind.