The obsession of Donald Trump with Arctic and its territories is increasingly ignored.
His fixation in Greenland, once considered a fleeting idea, turned into persistent and disturbing ambitions. In recent statements, the former president has again increased the opportunity to get an ice island and this time does not refuse the use of military power to achieve it.
With a disturbing mixture of trust and defiance, Trump’s comments raised his eyebrows globally. But what does this obsession really control? And more importantly, how far is he willing to go to become a reality?
The idea of ​​connecting Greenland is not just curiosity – it is a dangerous game that could transform international relations. Let’s dive into bold demands, will and the curious world of Trump’s Arctic ambitions.
Donald Trump continues to express his intense interest in Greenland, suggesting that the US could eventually take control of an island rich in resources. In a recent statement Trump indicated that military force can be used as a possibility and say “something could happen …”
Trump’s fixation in Greenland was released for a while as a bizarre and fleeting idea. However, he constantly strengthened his serious intention to ensure the territory belonging to Ally Denmark NATO, despite international resistance.
In a recent interview with NZC Trump, he again increased the subject of Greenland, this time in discussion whether the US could ever consider the use of force to absorb Canada as 51.
While he called a military action against Canada “highly unlikely,” Trump quickly redirected to Greenland and claimed, “Something can happen with Greenland. I’ll be honest, we need it for national and international security … I don’t see it with Canada. I just don’t see it.
Trump explained his position earlier and said that the military action remains a possibility, and he confirmed this attitude during the NBC interview. “I don’t rule out it. I’m not saying I will do it, but I don’t rule out anything.
No, no, we need Greenland very badly. Greenland is a very small number of people we take care of, and we appreciate them all. But we need that for international security,” he said.
The new Prime Minister of Greenland, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, did not waste time by refusing Trump’s idea of ​​the “purchase” of the island, which explained that Greenland would never be considered as property for sale. “We will never, we will never be a piece of property that anyone can buy, and this is the news that I think is most important to understand,” Nielsen stressed.
Despite these objections, Trump remains decisive. He said earlier that the acquisition of Greenland is certainty, even suggesting that this could be done without resorting to military power. “We get Greenland. Yeah, 100%. A good opportunity to do it without military power,” he noted, adding, “I don’t choose anything from the table.”
Trump’s ambitions will not stop in Greenland. In a separate interview on NBC *Meet the Press *Trump mentioned the possibility to make Canada 51. While he noted that the topic had not yet come up with the new Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump suggested that this idea could soon be on the table. Carney, along with a large majority of Canadians, expressed a strong opposition to such a proposal.
Trump, however, remains an open discussion about it and says, “I will always talk about it. You know why? Subsidizes Canada on the melody \ 200 billion dollars a year.” He continued: “We don’t need their cars. In fact, we don’t want their cars. We don’t need their energy. We don’t even want their energy. We have more than them.
Trump then laid his playground: “If Canada was part of the US, it wouldn’t cost us. It would be great … It would be a respected state. And if you look at our map, if you look at geography – I’m a real estate person – when I look at it, it would be, it would happen.
Whether it is Greenland or Canada, Trump’s vision for the future of North America is expansive and raises the question: Could Greenland ever become part of the US? His tireless attitude caused a heated debate – should it be a strategic step, or is it too far?
In conclusion, the ongoing fixation of Donald Trump in Greenland and even Canada raises serious questions about his long -term vision of North America. Its repeated remarks on the possible use of military force to ensure Greenland have caused outrage, especially from the leaders of Greenland, who firmly reject any idea of ​​the island to become American property.
Meanwhile, his reflections on Canada, which joined the US, further illustrate his unorthodox approach to geopolitics. While some may consider these ideas to be ambitious or even eccentric, the debate they generate forces us to consider the strategic consequences of such movements. Would the attachment of Greenland or Canada strengthen the USA around the world or exceed international standards?
Only time will show whether these courageous proposals will ever become a reality, but for the time being, the central part of Trump’s inheritance and the ongoing subject of the debate remain.