Trump Hints at Gaza Resolution, but U.S. Influence Remains Unclear
Washington, D.C., is abuzz after former President Donald Trump made a cryptic statement regarding the ongoing conflict in Gaza. He suggested the war could reach a “conclusive ending” within weeks — yet many observers were struck by what he left unsaid.
Unlike previous situations, when Trump personally intervened to halt military action with a single phone call, there is no sign he is pressing Israel to scale back its offensive, raising questions about America’s behind-the-scenes role.
A Look Back at Past Interventions
In June, Trump shocked the international community by stepping in to stop Israeli airstrikes on Iran. Reports indicated he personally called Prime Minister Netanyahu and posted on social media to order an immediate halt. The episode illustrated the exceptional influence the United States can wield over Israeli military decisions.
In contrast, the Gaza conflict has seen no such direct pressure. Trump has focused primarily on urging Hamas to release hostages, while refraining from encouraging Israel to slow or halt its military campaign — an approach that former President Biden attempted with limited results.
America’s Broad Support for Israel
U.S. backing of Israel extends far beyond weapons shipments. Washington has blocked UN ceasefire resolutions, imposed sanctions on international judges investigating Israeli officials, cracked down on domestic protests, and even threatened Canada with higher tariffs over its stance on the conflict. Few countries can exert such influence.
Should the United States withdraw support, it could create significant pressure on the Israeli government to consider a ceasefire. For now, there is no indication that such a move is imminent.
Trump has also claimed that the Israeli campaign has eliminated nearly all top Hamas leaders and thousands of fighters, describing it as “one of the most destructive military campaigns since World War II.”
Glimpses of a Possible Ending
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Trump offered a rare hint about the war’s future, stating that a “conclusive ending” could come within two to three weeks. “I think we’re doing a very good job,” he said. “But it does have to end.”
Conclusion
Trump’s remarks leave policymakers and the international community in a state of uncertainty. His decision not to pressure Israel, combined with his suggestion that the conflict may soon conclude, presents a complex picture of U.S. involvement.
Whether this signals a potential breakthrough or merely reflects continued support for Israel, one fact remains clear: American decisions will play a decisive role in shaping the war’s outcome. The coming weeks may reveal whether Trump’s prediction comes to fruition or if the conflict continues despite his confidence.