Is the US government erased quietly by the possibilities of gender identity?
This is a question that many Americans ask after a sudden wave of reversal of politics under the new term of President Donald Trump. Just a few days after his return to the White House, he began to rise across federal agencies,
increasing eyebrows and inducing outrage – especially from the LGBTQ+ communities and human rights advocates. Could it signal a wider return of progress in recent years?
The new Trump Executive Order limits the options for gender brands on the American passport
Since the beginning of his second term as the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump has published a number of executive orders, including the one who now creates significant changes in how gender is recognized in official American documents – especially passport.
In addition to orders affecting immigration, employment and climate policy, one of the first Trump events after his inauguration address was to sign an executive order entitled “Defense of Women against Gender ideology and restoring the Biological Truth to the Federal Government”.
This new policy will effectively reverse the decision made during the biden administration, which allowed neo -fault individuals to select “X” as a gender mark on the waist. Trump’s order orders that federal agencies will now be recognized only two gender categories – ile and women – based on biological s*x at birth.
This change directly affects non-binary, genderqueer and other gender individuals who will no longer be able to choose neutral “X” in any federal identification documents, including passports, birth certificates and other official records. According to Uniland, a survey of 2021 estimated that approximately 1.2 million people in the US are currently holding passports marked with the gender identifier “X”.
Foreign Minister Marco Rubio has strengthened this directive in a report to government employees and said: “The United States policy is that the gender of the individual is not variable.” He further explained that official documents must use gender, not a gender identity as their basis, and that US passports are now exposed to these restrictions.
NBC News reported that the Foreign Ministry had stopped issuing “X” brands and records of birth for US citizens born abroad. Rubio ordered employees not to process any such applications until other instructions were provided.
Pass already released with the option of “X” gender will be valid for now. However, individuals who want to renew or apply for new travel documents may face significant challenges in the near future.
Conclusion:
Trump’s executive order is a significant shift in the federal policy of gender recognition and effectively eliminates non -coal and gender identity from official American documentation. While the existing “X” gender brand remains valid for the time being, the future of gender neutral identification is uncertain according to this administration.
Since federal agencies are waiting for further teaching, individuals can affect the policy to face challenges in updating or acquiring their documents. This change raised concerns between law advocates and LGBTQ+communities, who consider this step back as inclusiveness and recognition.