Could the most popular application of social media in the US soon be away?
The possibility of banning tiktok hangs over the heads of the moon users, and now it seems that it will be inevitable. Given that the government proposed prohibition recently confirmed by the Supreme Court, Tiktok’s fate is now sealed in the US – if something drastic change.
The decision was thinking much about the future of its favorite content creators as well as your own involvement in the application. What does it mean for the influences that rely on Tiktok’s income and how will it affect millions of users who have changed the platform into a necessary part of their social media?
The answers to these questions are far from clear, but one thing is certain: this decision has created a precedent that could forever translate the landscape of social media.
The Supreme Court confirmed the government’s proposed prohibition of Tiktk, which effectively pushed through the nationwide ban on application in the United States.
On Friday, January 17, Scotus confirmed its unanimous decision to maintain the protection of Americans from the Act on the opponents controlled opponents, which was introduced last year.
The Sonia Sotomayor has issued a concurrent opinion and said that it sees no reason to assume that the law does not include the first amendment, because the tiktok includes expressive activities such as “assembly and curatorial” content.
She noted that laws imposing an excessive burden on expressive activity must undergo an increased control under the first addition, and this act clearly imposes such a burden by preventing tiktoku to distribute its speech if the company undergoes sale. She added that the act further prohibits Tiktok to cooperate with certain entities on its “content recommendation algorithm” even after sale.
The bill, which was proposed after fear of potential espionage due to the ownership of Tiktoku from the Chinese Society of Society, caused a significant debate. Despite participating in the questioning of the consequences of the first amendment to Bill, the ruling path for the probable shutdown of Tiktok by Sunday, January 19, if the President enters or decide to sell the platform. Despite Kevin’s efforts to buy a tiktoku, the Fattedance claimed that they were not planning to sell.
If no further measures are taken, Tiktok will be removed from app stores on Sunday. The Statnance also warned that it could stop services for US users who have already downloaded the app unless the US cares Apple and Google that they will not face fines for hosting and distributing Tiktoku.
This confirmation of the ban has influenced, many of which are relied on by tiktok for their income, confused and concerned. Singer Bebe Rexha expressed her confusion in the video tiktok and asked where all the “great people” would go as soon as the app is forbidden. In the comments, followers designed formed applications such as blues and RedNote.
Other data on social media expressed concern about the loss of valuable current income. Marc d’Amelio, performed at ABC News Studios “Impact X Nightline”, “I think everyone will lose; small businesses lose and even politicians lose.”
Influencers earned money through Tiktok Creator Fund, which rewards users at least 100,000 authentic views for a 30 -day period. The yields are based on the number and authenticity of opinions, as well as the involvement of followers, with daily changes in scholarships and without a fixed maximum.
In addition, Tiktokers monetized their presence through the brand sponsorship, selling goods in the Tiktok store, tips from followers, live currents and associated partnerships. The ban on the platform could have a significant financial impact on these creators and a wider social media environment.
In conclusion, the decision of the Supreme Court to comply with the Tiktok ban is a significant turning point for the application and its large user base. The decision could lead to the closure of tiktoku in the US already 19 January unless other measures are taken. For influential and celebrities that have built their career on the platform, the ban threatens the disruption of their livelihood and income flows.
Thanks to the possibilities of monetization through the Creator Fund, the brand partnership and the endangered live streaming, many have been wondering where they will go. The situation is still evolving and its full impact on the creators, businesses and the wider environment of social media needs to be seen.
However, the decision emphasizes permanent concerns about national security and regulation of application ownership, so users and experts in the field are anxiously waiting for the next steps.