What is particularly unsettling about these claims is the complete absence of transparency regarding these alleged projects.
Despite the enormous amount of money involved—$21 trillion, which is much larger than most government budgets—there has been no official recognition or detailed explanation. This situation raises important questions:
how could such significant expenses go unnoticed by the public and the government for such a long time? What are the potential beneficiaries of these hidden underground cities, and what are the underlying motives driving their creation?
The magnitude and confidentiality of the preparations indicate a level of readiness for extreme situations that are beyond the comprehension of ordinary citizens, leading to speculation about a covert government operating outside the boundaries of democracy.Â
A former U.S. government official has made a shocking claim that the American government secretly built an underground city with a value of \$21 trillion to be ready for major global catastrophes.Â
In the current tense geopolitical climate, characterized by escalating conflicts between the United States and China, the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war, and the persistent Israeli-Palestinian strife, the likelihood of a third world war seems more plausible to many.Â
Catherine Austin Fitts, who held the position of assistant secretary of housing and urban development under President George H.W. Bush from 1989 to 1990, asserts that the United States has been covertly preparing for significant disasters for an extended period.Â
During an interview on Tucker Carlson’s podcast, Fitts mentioned a report by economist Mark Skidmore from Michigan State University, which revealed a staggering $21 trillion in ‘unauthorized spending’ between 1998 and 2017.
She emphasized that the u.S. Army’s budget was \$122 billion, indicating that these unsupported adjustments were 54 times the amount that congress had authorized.
‘normally, budget adjustments are only a minor part of the total authorized spending,’ Fitts clarified.Â
After extensive research, she suspects that these significant missing funds were utilized to construct approximately 170 underground bases spread across the United States.Â
She elaborated: ‘one of the things I investigated regarding where this money went is the underground bases, city infrastructure, and transportation networks that have been constructed.’.Â
Fitts mentioned that some of these hidden locations might be hidden beneath the oceans, although she acknowledged that she is uncertain about the exact locations of all these sites.
According to her, the main objective of these concealed bunkers is to protect significant individuals in the event of a near-extinction catastrophe or to support covert government operations.Â
For example, if you are running a secret space program, you need secure platforms that are hidden from viewÂ
Fitts remembered a project from 2010 or 2012 called “Top Secret America,” where two reporters created a database containing information about numerous top-secret government installations constructed across the country after the passage of the patriot act.Â
‘what stood out was the significant increase in expenditure on constructing both underground and above-ground facilities,’ she saidÂ
In summary, the author paints a vivid picture of an extensive and largely hidden underground network, financed by trillions of dollars that are not included in official budgets, with the primary purpose of safeguarding the elite during potential global catastrophes.Â
In summary, Catherine Austin Fitts’ claims propose that the U.S. Government has been covertly allocating trillions of dollars to the development of an extensive underground network of bases and infrastructure. These facilities, estimated to be around 170 and possibly extending beneath the oceans, are believed to be constructed to safeguard important individuals and facilitate covert operations during severe global catastrophes.
Although these claims have not been substantiated, they shed light on the magnitude and confidentiality of certain government initiatives, prompting discussions about the need for greater transparency and accountability in public spending.