In a tense exchange for CBS, vice president J.D. Vance found himself pushing back against what he saw as an unfair campaign against Tulsi Gabbard.
CBS Margaret Brennan’s anchor seemed to emphasize critical voices from conservative media and question whether Gabbard’s nomination for the National Intelligence Director was a risk. But Vance didn’t have it – it defines Gabbard’s record and causes the relevance of these media.
The conversation was quickly escalating when Vance focused on the influence of guerrilla narratives on American politics. What began as a routine conversation has turned into a accused discussion of distortion of the media, political power and the future of the American intelligence service.
CBS Anchor Margaret Brennan tried to discredit Tulsi Gabbard using selective subtitles, a step that vice president J.D. Vance strongly against.
During their exchange of CBS, Vance was the nomination of Gabbard for the director of National Intelligence and responded to Brennan’s critical questioning for her record.
Brennan pointed out conservative publications such as *The Wall Street Journal *and *National Review *, criticized by Gabard and called her a poor nominee for his defense by Edward Snowden and her refusal to accept certain intelligence intelligence findings. She asked, “Does it make you a re -evaluation to be in charge of the US news?”
Vance quickly rejected her concern and said, “No, Margaret, look, these are the same publications that tirelessly attacked Donald Trump. However, these publications do not determine who will become president – American people, and is Donald Trump.
Brennan replied, “The Senate will have the last word.”
To which Vance replied, “Yes, the Senate advises and consent to how the Constitution requires it. Tulsi is the right person that will happen.”
Brennan retorted, “But they do not believe these intelligence services.”
Exchange between Vice and Brennan vice president reflects a shift towards more meaningful discussions about national security. Vance’s unwavering support for Tulsi Gabbard emphasizes the importance of evaluation nominated on the basis of their qualifications and potential for reform, rather than with guerrilla narratives focused on the media.
Do not hesitate and share this article with friends and family on Facebook.
In conclusion, the exchange of vice -president J.D. Vance with anchor CBS Margaret Brennan emphasizes growing emphasis on major interviews about national security, focusing on the qualifications and integrity of nominated rather than on the story of the medium.
His unwavering defense Tulsi Gabbard reflects the obligation to evaluate candidates based on their experience and the ability to restore confidence in vital institutions rather than allow partisan voices to dictate conversation. This stock exchange serves as a reminder that Americans through their elected representatives should be those who determine the future of the country’s leadership, not the media.