Wendy Drill has had her “PB4WEGO” tag for a very long time and is pleased with it.
However, as of late, New Hampshire said it was improper, which annoyed and befuddled her.
The DMV rejected her solicitation to keep it, saying it had hostile phrasing. Wendy utilizes her vehicle to communicate her thoughts and make individuals grin.
Wendy firmly feels that her entitlement to free articulation is being disregarded by the state’s choice. That’s what she contends “pee before we go” is simply parental counsel and isn’t hostile. She thinks the DMV’s choice unjustifiably removed her freedoms.
Getting the “PB4WEGO” plate was nothing to joke about for Wendy. After New Hampshire permitted seven characters on plates rather than six, she was eager to get it. She was extremely content with this little accomplishment, however presently it is by all accounts vanishing.
The state depends on unambiguous standards about vanity plates to back up its choice. They say what is happening is because of these principles, which depended on an old court choice. However, is it reasonable to make Wendy quit any trace of something that has become critical to her?
This has yet to be addressed: should Wendy lose her dearest vanity plate? She trusts the specialists will reexamine and see that her message is innocuous as she battles to keep it.