ICE Agent Jonathan Ross
The agent who fatally shot Renee Good on January 7, 2026, is Jonathan Ross, a veteran federal law enforcement officer.
Ross has served in the Indiana National Guard and Iraq, and later joined U.S. Border Patrol and ICE. He also has experience as a firearms instructor, active-shooter instructor, field intelligence officer, and member of specialized response teams.
In June 2025, Ross was seriously injured when he was dragged by a vehicle during an attempted arrest in Minnesota, resulting in hospital treatment. The driver involved was convicted of assaulting a federal officer.
The Shooting
Video footage shows Good’s SUV moving forward as Ross approached and fired multiple shots at close range.
Federal authorities have described the incident as self-defense, claiming Good “weaponized her vehicle.”
Local leaders and critics argue the video raises questions about whether deadly force was justified.
The incident sparked protests in Minneapolis and national debate over federal law enforcement tactics.
Investigation and Response
The FBI has taken primary control of the investigation, limiting local law enforcement access to evidence, which has drawn criticism from Minnesota officials and civil-rights advocates.
Good’s family has retained a legal team and is pursuing civil action, emphasizing accountability and transparency.
Broader Context
Protests and public scrutiny continue, highlighting concerns over federal immigration enforcement, use-of-force policies, and investigative transparency.
The case has amplified national debates about the role of federal agents, especially in local jurisdictions, and the balance between officer safety and civilian protection.
Key Takeaways
Jonathan Ross’s long law enforcement and military experience, combined with prior injury in the line of duty, is part of the narrative defending his actions.
Video footage and eyewitness reports have fueled conflicting interpretations of the shooting.
The ongoing investigation and civil legal action underscore the tension between official claims of self-defense and public demands for accountability.
This incident illustrates how law enforcement, media coverage, and public perception intersect in highly charged, politically sensitive cases.