In a strikingly intense address at the United Nations today, former President Donald Trump unsettled global leaders with remarks that broke from diplomatic norms.
Speaking for nearly an hour—well beyond the usual 15-minute limit—Trump launched a forceful attack on “open borders” policies while hinting at deeper, simmering tensions beneath the UN’s formal veneer. The speech has left many questioning whether this was simply a political critique or the beginning of a more confrontational international posture.
Trump’s nearly hour-long speech targeted world leaders directly, condemning countries with “open borders” and warning bluntly, “your countries are going to hell” due to lax immigration enforcement.
He accused the UN of offering “empty words” and openly challenged the organization’s relevance. Highlighting cases of asylum seekers involved in criminal acts, he declared, “They repaid kindness with crime. It’s time to end the failed experiment of open borders.”
Before the speech, UN Secretary-General António Guterres met with Trump and expressed willingness to collaborate for peace: “We are entirely at your disposal to work together toward a just peace.” Trump responded with a measured endorsement: “Our country supports the United Nations 100%. Its potential is incredible. I may not always agree, but I am fully behind its mission. The potential for peace is tremendous, and I appreciate how graciously we were received.”
Afterwards, Trump shared his thoughts on Truth Social, stating: “It was a great honor to speak before the United Nations. I believe the speech was very well received. It focused on energy and immigration, issues I’ve been addressing for a long time. This Forum provided an excellent platform to emphasize these points. I hope everyone gets to watch it!”
Conclusion
Donald Trump’s address to the UN mixed sharp criticism with a strong endorsement of the organization’s potential, leaving global observers and leaders to weigh its tone and impact. While he condemned “open borders” and questioned the UN’s effectiveness, he also affirmed America’s support for the institution, blending provocative rhetoric with diplomatic acknowledgment.
The unusually lengthy speech, packed with pointed statements, has already ignited debate worldwide about immigration policy, international cooperation, and the evolving role of the United Nations on the global stage.